Header image alt text

Joyce Clark Unfiltered

For "the rest of the story"

Feb 26

12

83rd Avenue is Alligator Alley…long overdue

Posted by Joyce Clark on February 12, 2026
Posted in City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Former Councilmember Joyce Clark • Glendale Economic Development • Glendale finances • Glendale zoning issues • Yucca district  | Tagged With: , , , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

The last four years I served on Glendale city council, from 2020 to 2024, I pushed hard to have 83rd Avenue from Glendale Avenue to Northern Avenue (I call it Alligator Alley) reconstructed. I call it Alligator Alley because it is possibly the worst road in Glendale. It has so many patches you would think you were riding on an old-fashioned, rippled washboard.

I have to say that the city’s Transportation department has always accommodated any previous concern I have had but this time, they have dropped the proverbial ball. Or should I say they have not picked it up.

The necessary funding and reconstruction design are there. In 2023, staff revealed that there were right-of-way issues with several property owners along 83rd Avenue. I was told at the time that if the city could not acquire the necessary right-of-way through negotiation it would have to condemn the strips needed. Three years later, this is still an unresolved issue.

In 2024, staff said they were waiting for Salt River Project to resolve their issues at the intersection of 83rd and Glendale Avenue. Two years later, the Transportation department is still waiting. They have the ability to reach out to SRP to prioritize this project. They have not done so.

This situation is unacceptable.

83rd Avenue is a traffic reliever road when there are major events such as football games and concerts at Westgate. The heavy traffic makes a terrible road even worse.

It is way past time for the Transportation department to get its act together. If there are still property owner hold outs, then it is time to condemn the strips needed for reconstruction. It’s also time for staff to get SRP to immediately resolve its issues.

If you share my view of 83rd Avenue, I urge you to send an email expressing your concerns to our Director of Transportation, Purab Adabala and to Jamsheed Mehta, Assistant City Manager overseeing the Transportation department. Their email addresses are:

Haven’t we waited long enough? It reminds me of the city’s commitment to finish Heroes Park.

© Joyce Clark, 2026   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Jan 26

25

Braggin’ on Glendale

Posted by Joyce Clark on January 25, 2026
Posted in City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale Economic Development • Glendale elected officials • Glendale finances • Glendale zoning issues • Luke Air Force Base • VAI Resort • Westgate • Yucca district  | Tagged With: , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

When I first began serving as a Glendale city councilmember in 1992, its population was 159,023 and its square miles were 52.2. In 2025, its population exploded to 265,599, an increase of over 100,000. Its square miles increased to 67.2, an increase of 15 square miles.

In 2019, Glendale’s city council adopted its vision for the Loop 303 corridor. It rejected the concept of adding more residential and instead chose to earmark that area for manufacturing and industrial development.  In 6 short years, the Loop 303 corridor has become the premier site for such development.

In December of 2025, recent news from many trade publications highlighted Glendale, Arizona, as a leader in economic growth and investments across multiple sectors. Did you know that Glendale leads all U.S. submarkets in industrial sales volume, surpassing $1 billion this year alone, driven by major deals like Walmart’s $152 million purchase of a 1.28 million-square-foot warehouse near Luke Air Force Base?

This reflects the city’s booming industrial sector along the Loop 303 corridor, where developments like a 2.4 million-square-foot industrial park by Lincoln Property Company are attracting logistics and manufacturing firms. Additionally, Glendale was named Arizona’s Best City for Business in June 2025 by the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, citing its pro-growth policies, job creation (nearly 13,000 jobs added in six years), and over $1.5 billion in ongoing investment projects, primarily in the Sports and Entertainment District.

This includes high-profile developments around Westgate Entertainment District, such as hotels, retail, and entertainment venues tied to attractions like State Farm Stadium.

Key projects contributing to these figures include:

  • The $1 billion VAI Resort, a 70-acre complex with a Mattel Adventure Park, hotels, and entertainment features, approved for construction and expected to boost tourism.
  • Nestlé USA’s $675 million beverage factory, which opened in early 2025 and created over 350 jobs.
  • Mark Anthony Brewing’s $250 million facility for White Claw and other products, operational since 2020.
  • Walmart acquired a 1.28 million square-foot building near Luke Air Force Base.

The $152 million purchase is Phoenix’s second-largest industrial building sale ever recorded.

These investments have helped Glendale diversify beyond sports and events (e.g., Super Bowl economic impacts exceeding $1 billion in regional activity), positioning it as a top West Valley hub for business and development.

Businesses in the Loop 303 Corridor, Glendale, AZThe Loop 303 corridor in Glendale, Arizona, has seen significant industrial and commercial development, attracting various companies focused on manufacturing, distribution, and logistics. Below is a compiled list of businesses located in this area (not all inclusive as I may have missed some), based on available information from economic development reports, real estate listings, and news articles. The list includes details of their operations where available:

  • Red Bull

             Manufacturing facility (first in North America, over $280 million investment,

             750,000 sq ft)

             Reems and Peoria Roads

  • Amazon

             Distribution operations; leased industrial building

             VT303; also surrounding The Cubes

  • REI

             Warehouse complex (400,000 sq ft)

              Loop 303 corridor

  • Williams Sonoma

              Distribution or warehousing

             The Cubes at Glendale

  • S. Merchants

             Distribution or warehousing

             The Cubes at Glendale

  • White Claw

              Production facility

              Surrounding The Cubes at Glendale

  • Ball Corporation

             Manufacturing (food storage and aluminum cans; supplies Red Bull)

             Surrounding The Cubes; Loop 303 corridor

  • Walmart

             Distribution center (1.25 million sq ft)

             Park303 Phase 1

  • FedEx

             Distribution or logistics

             Surrounding The Cubes at Glendale

  • Sub-Zero

             Manufacturing center (nearly 700,000 sq ft, luxury appliances)

             Loop 303 corridor (opened 2011, expanded 2016)

  • Dick’s Sporting Goods

             Distribution center (624,000 sq ft, high-tech)

             Loop 303 corridor (opened 2013)

  • Chewy

             Online pet products distributor

             Loop 303 corridor

  • UPS

             Distribution operations

             Loop 303 corridor

  • Bimbo Bakeries

             Distribution operations

             Loop 303 corridor

  • Dollar Tree

             Regional distribution facility (1.3 million sq ft)

             Park303 Phase 2 Building C

  • Logisticus Group

             Third-party logistics (550,000 sq ft lease)

             Park303 Phase 2

  • Axle on Demand

             Logistics specialist (126,075 sq ft pre-lease)

             Echo Park 303

Several developments like VT303 North, Bethany Bay, and Latitude 303 Logistics are under construction or recently completed as of 2025 but do not have publicly announced tenants yet. The area continues to grow with speculative industrial projects attracting e-commerce, manufacturing, and logistics firms.

There is no doubt that Glendale has become a powerhouse in the Valley. Thirty years ago, it was a small town with an economy that was unremarkable. With the advent of the Bell Road corridor, the growth of Luke Air Force Base, the development of the Westgate area and the Loop 303 corridor, it has become a vibrant community with a diversified economic base.

It’s braggin’ time! If you are a manufacturing, logistics or distribution facility and need to grow where the weather is perfect year-round with a great roadway system and an abundant labor force, welcome to Glendale, Arizona!

© Joyce Clark, 2026   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law

and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have

not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic,

scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted

material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Jan 26

22

Alert for La Buena Vida and Stonehaven residents

Posted by Joyce Clark on January 22, 2026
Posted in City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale Economic Development • Glendale zoning issues • Yucca district  | Tagged With: , , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

Yesterday, as a city Interested Party, I received notification that Diversified Partners, the developer of the small commercial center on Cardinals Way and 91st Avenue, is proposing to place a convenience store and 8 gas pumps at the site indicated in red below:

 

A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 2, 2026, at 6pm at the Holiday Inn, 6151 N. 99th Avenue. If you cannot attend, please contact Phil Martinez for the City of Glendale  at 623-930-3071 or email him at pmartinez@glendaleaz.com with your comments.

I believe that this use is an inappropriate location for such an intense use and will add to the congestion already experienced on Cardinals Way. I urge you to take the time to attend this neighborhood meeting and to learn more about this proposed project.

© Joyce Clark, 2026   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law

and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have

not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic,

scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted

material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Dec 25

20

People who live in glass houses should not throw stones

Posted by Joyce Clark on December 20, 2025
Posted in 2026 general election • Barrell District • Cactus District • City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale elected officials • Glendale finances  | Tagged With: , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

On December 10, 2025, Councilmember Lupe Conchas gave a TV interview on ABC with Adam Mintzer regarding his opposition to councilmember stipends. Here are some quotes from that TV story.

In 2022 an administrative policy was initiated giving councilmembers $900 per month for incidental costs and $450 monthly for car allowances. The allowances are intended to cover personal incidental expenses, including home-office costs, internet, technology, office supplies, incidental meals, mileage and repairs. 

 In August of 2025, Councilmember Lupe Conchas brought the issue to a council workshop and called the policy “a slush fund.” Yet at one time he had no objection to it and accepted the stipend for the first 6 months of his term. Then someone whispered in his ear that this might make for a good campaign issue.

His mentor, Councilmember Bart Turner, supports Conchas’ position. He characterizes the policy as a potential conflict with existing city expense systems. “There is no data to back this policy up,” Turner said. “Feels to me like it would be double dipping to take this…and for the record, I never have.” He may not have double-dipped, but he appears to have been very cavalier in his use of taxpayer dollars for his many trips.

A majority, four of the other six councilmembers and the mayor expressed support for maintaining the current policy during that August meeting.

Councilmember Ray Malnar defended the allowances, saying he spends significant money on home-office expenses. “We are being reimbursed for legitimate business expenses,” Malnar said. “I spend a lot of money on printers. I print a lot of things at home.”

Mayor Jerry Weiers said the numbers are justified for active councilmembers. “If you work for it. If you put in time. Your mileage…I find it entirely justifiable,” Weiers said.

Councilmember Lauren Tolmachoff disagreed with characterizing the policy negatively. “I don’t think our residents expect us to behave like martyrs,” Tolmachoff said.

The City of Tempe has a $12,000 stipend for councilmembers’ cars and other expenses that don’t require them to submit receipts. So, Glendale is not the only city with such a policy.

A week later, December 17, 2025, the Phoenix New Times reported that the very same Councilmember, Lupe Conchas, directly asked the public in October 2025, to send him money through ApplePay and Zelle for his personal home repairs. He says he received $650 but he expects us to take his word for it.

People who give money directly to a politician, with no transparency as to who gave how much creates an appearance problem. It could also evade campaign finance requirements. Conchas admits that he did not think about a perception problem. He appears to be either very stupid or very arrogant. In essence, he used his official position to obtain money for personal use.

He did not consult with the City Attorney. Why? Perhaps because he knew that if he had the City Attorney would have advised against it whether it was legal to do so or not.

Then there is Councilmember Turner’s support of Conchas on this issue. I wrote a series of 4 blog posts on Turner’s fast and loose use of his City ProCard (city credit card). Turner talks about the need for data but often, after repeated staff requests, never supplied the requisite information or receipts to back up expenditures incurred on his many trips using city funds. Many of his trips to the same events attended by other councilmembers cost more than that of any other councilmember. He even asked the city to cover his Renaissance Weekend trips which were purely personal enrichment events.

Clearly, neither of these two councilmembers can legitimately question stipends when they appear to have financially sinned. Conchas deliberately used his elected position to solicit money from the public for personal expenses and Turner has a very questionable history with his use of the city ProCard.

A majority, five councilmembers, support and defend this policy, as do I. For 20 years of my 24 years of service as a councilmember, I paid personally for the very items the stipend covers. In my last 4 years of service, I was grateful that there was a stipend to cover the very expenses I had personally incurred and paid for over many years.

Why did these two men bring this forward? This is an election year. Conchas is supporting Rory Goree who is running against the incumbent, Councilmember Leandro Baldenegro. Turner, who has decided not to run again (perhaps because of his questionable use of the ProCard) has endorsed Lisa Baker. They need to help their chosen candidates and what better way than ginning this up an election issue. Just watch, both of these candidates will use stipends as a campaign issue. After all, if they were to run on their merit, both candidates lose.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Sep 25

29

Glendale is having a November bond election

Posted by Joyce Clark on September 29, 2025
Posted in City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale Economic Development  | Tagged With: , , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

Please note: I have not posted in the past few months due to a family member’s medical emergency. The situation has stabilized, granting me the freedom to write about Glendale, its people, places and events, once again.

On November 4, 2025, Glendale is on your ballot regarding two bond questions. Let’s start with what are bonds. Bonds are a way for cities to pay for large, expensive capital projects like the construction or renovation of city buildings. The city sells the bonds to investors and pays the investors back with interest over 20 to 25 years.

Glendale is seeking voter approval for two bond questions. Question 1 asks you to approve an investment of $30 million for flood control. In late September of this year, we experienced heavy monsoon storms that caused flooding throughout the city. One of the hardest hit areas was the Grand Avenue, Bethany Home Road, and 43rd Avenue intersection. Once again, streets and businesses were flooded. This area needs some permanent relief and funds approved from Question 1 will provide a permanent solution.

Question 2 asks you to approve an investment of $35 million for the city’s operations campus. It is a 40-year-old campus in need of major renovation. One of the most critical elements is replacing swamp coolers with air conditioning. Yes, our employees work in buildings that still use old, swamp coolers and we all know how ineffective that is during the monsoon season when the humidity is high. Some of these 40-year-old buildings have never been renovated.

The first question always asked, is, will these bonds raise my property taxes? The answer is no for two reasons. One, the city has a self-imposed debt limit. This means that the city will not issue new bond debt until old bond debt is paid off. By keeping the debt limit constant, the debt payments remain at the same level and no property tax increase is required. Two, the city council passed a resolution that publicly pledges that the debt limit will remain constant to insure that property taxes do not increase.

I pulled up my most recent property tax bill reflecting 2025. My bill is $3700, and Glendale’s portion is $306.69 or 10% of my entire bill. By way of contrast, schools/education are $2843.32 or 77% of my property tax bill. The remaining portion or 13% is for the county and special districts. It should be noted that Tolleson education increased year over year by 89% and community college education increased by 57%. As you will note, Glendale’s portion is low and the major reason for an annual increase in your property tax can be attributed to education assessments that grow from year to year.

When you receive your mail in ballot in early October it will be long and full of all kinds of office seekers and questions. Glendale’s bond questions will be at the very end of your ballot. Please take the time to find them, vote yes, and mail your ballot back promptly. It is important and you can make the difference.

Glendale’s bond questions 1 and 2 are for critical needs within our community. I am voting yes on both questions. As Chairperson of the 2025 Glendale Bond Committee, I know how important these needs are. I urge you to join me in voting yes on Glendale bond questions 1 and 2.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Jul 25

9

Councilmember Turner and his use of city ProCard, Part 5, final

Posted by Joyce Clark on July 9, 2025
Posted in Barrell District • City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale elected officials • Glendale finances  | Tagged With: , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council

On January 16, 2025, I submitted a Public Records Request to the City of Glendale for all records pertaining to Councilmember Bart Turner’s travel expenses and the use of his city ProCard. That request was completed and given to me on March 12, 2025. It included over 500 pages of documentation. In the past four months, I have reviewed them over and over again.

All of the information I have provided on this 5-part series on Councilmember Turner and his use of his city credit card, the ProCard, have been taken from the city provided documentation. They are facts.

What have we learned?

  • Councilmembers Malnar and Tolmachoff have been transparent and accountable for their use of their ProCards. On the city Follow Your Money site they have listed all trips from 2018 to the present. Councilmember Turner has listed only 3 trips in 2019. Nothing is presented for his numerous trips through 2024. Turner throws out the buzz words, ‘transparency’ and ‘accountability’ whenever he can. He portray himself to be a watchdog of taxpayer dollars. Yet when it comes to spending your money on his numerous trips, it becomes a situation of ‘Rules for thee but not for me’. So much for practicing what he preaches. I did not compare with Councilmembers Baldenegro, Guzman or Conchas as they are new and have no history to date.
  • Staff repeatedly gave Turner all policies related to expenditures and travel and made numerous requests for back up documentation and/or receipts. He was minimally responsive. Consequently, staff put together a chart showing his lack of response and back up. That chart reflects over $22,000 in travel expenses without the proper information required to back up his expenses. Turner needs to come out of the closet, take responsibility, and repay you, the taxpayer, for his poor judgement.
  • Turner’s Renaissance Weekend trips totaling over $8,300 are clearly self-enrichment trips and are not related to city business. These trips show a clear lack of judgement and awareness. How he could possibly charge these trips to the city demonstrates his lack of ethical judgement. It appears to be an abuse of city policy.
  • His Vertical farming trips are questionable as well. The city does not engage in farming, vertical or otherwise. They are not related to city business.
  • City policy dictates that airfare upgrades, additional baggage fees, seat upgrades and tipping above 20% are not allowed. Turner violated all of these policies on multiple occasions.
  • Turner’s Pro Card was deactivated in December of 2024. When I received the city provided public documents in March of 2025, there was nothing to indicate it had been reactivated. If it has, it occurred after March of this year.

This 5-part series is Bart Turner’s “Sammy Chavira moment.” For those of you who may not recall, former Councilmember Sammy Chavira took a trip to NYC on your dime to see the Pope. Unfortunately for Sammy, the closest he got to the Pope was to watch him on TV. Sammy abused you, the taxpayer, and your dollars and demonstrated his lack of ethics and judgement. In doing so, he lost his bid for reelection as councilmember.

Bart Turner has done exactly as Sammy Chavira did. He has abused you, the taxpayer and your dollars. As he berates everyone for not being fiscally responsible, he displays an arrogance toward taxpayers by refusing to acknowledge his trips publicly or to provide the necessary justification for the use of his ProCard as a business-related trip with proper documentation.

Councilmember Turner will undoubtedly run for reelection next year, 2026. All of the material, based on factual documentation in this 5-part series, should be taken into consideration when the time comes to vote on a Barrel district councilmember. His lack of financial disclosure and lack of ethics disqualify him for another term as the Barrel district councilmember. I suspect when the time comes there will be better choices for the Barrel voters.

Councilmember Bart Turner of the Barrell district has shown through his actions and his judgment his disdain for Glendale taxpayers. His public pronouncements are not the same as his actions when it comes to travel expenditures paid with taxpayer dollars. He does not deserve a single vote from Barrell district voters.

If the media or any potential Turner-opposed candidates would like to view the requested public information I am happy to share. Please email clarkjv@aol.com or text me at 602-320-3422.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Jul 25

2

Councilmember Turner and his use of ProCard, Part 4

Posted by Joyce Clark on July 2, 2025
Posted in Barrell District • City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale elected officials • Glendale finances  | Tagged With: , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

In Part 1, I explained the use of a city ProCard and how seriously it is taken. In Part 2, I showed what travel expenditures Councilmember Turner has publicly posted as well as all of the trips he has not posted publicly. In Part 3, the public information request I made includes any and all emails between city staff and Councilmember Turner.

In Part 4 we see what trips Councilmember Turner put on his ProCard and whether they reflected a city business interest. As part of my public information request, I received a staff generated chart that reflects all Turner trips where documentation in the form of agendas, itineraries or receipts were NOT supplied by Councilmember Turner.

THE TOTAL PAID BY THE CITY FOR WHICH DOCUMENTATION AND/OR PROOF OF A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY WAS NOT PROVIDED TOTALS $22,555.61.

  • AG Tech Summit $3,201.99
  • Sister Cities, Germany $872.68
  • August 2023 League Conference $858.04
  • Renaissance Weekend October 2023 $3,706.71
  • Airfare to DC October 2023 $803.22
  • League of Cities Summit November 2023 $1,934.50
  • Colorado Water Users December 2023 $1,885.00
  • Renaissance Weekend December 2023 $4,661.51
  • League of Cities March 2024 $4,631.93

As stated previously, trips are required to have documentation for expenses and a stated business purpose. Although Turner did not provide all the documentation required for the League trips, they do qualify as a business purpose.

However, some trips (excluding League trips) are questionable. One was tCity ohe AG Tech Summit. This conference was held by The Center of Excellence for Indoor Agriculture. Its key themes from its website state:

  • Finding New Sources of Funding in a Changing Economic Landscape
  • Alleviating the Impact of the Energy Crisis through Efficiencies and Alternatives
  • Accelerating Automation to Improve Crop Care and Reduce Operational Costs
  • Balancing Biology and Technology for Crop Growth and Profitability
  • Unlocking the Potential of Plant Genetics to Sow the Seeds of Growth
  • Growing Margins Through New Product Innovation from Crop to Shelf
  • Exploring the Global Potential of Indoor Farming and the Next Regional Hotspots
  • Promoting CEA as a Critical Piece of the Food Security Puzzle
  • Creating Industry Standards to Build Confidence and Communicate the Benefits of CEA

The site describes the conference as: “From multi-acre scale facility design to seed optimization for vertical growing, and from multi-million-dollar funding rounds to the fine margins of running profitable farms, an international speaking faculty will discuss the critical success factors for CEA in today’s economic environment.”

How this conference and his attendance benefitted the city is unknown. The city does not engage in vertical farming, nor is it looking for investors for such a project.

In part of the Sister Cities trip to Germany, Turner took a Vertical farming tour. Again, the city does not engage in farming or vertical farming.

The most egregious use of your taxpayer dollars was for two Renaissance Weekend trips totaling over $8,300.00. Please go to their website, https://www.renaissanceweekend.org/

These trips were purely personal enrichment trips with no city business to be derived from them. It’s a rather secretive organization with no agendas of any kind to be found on its website. I did find the following description: “Renaissance Weekend’s primary purpose is to create an environment free of partisanship and commercialism, where substantive conversations can thrive. It is described as more than a conference, emphasizing a casual, welcoming culture where all participants are heard, and all opinions are welcome. The gatherings are inter-disciplinary, inter-generational, and family-friendly, with provisions for children, including Camp Renaissance programs for younger attendees accompanied by adults. The organization’s mission is to discuss urgent questions of today and essential issues of human experience, fostering bridges among thought-leaders, trend-setters, authorities, and rising stars.

Activities at these weekends include seminars, discussions, informal lectures, and performances, with attendees designing their own schedules from available talks and sessions. Events are held several times a year, with the largest gathering traditionally around New Year’s and smaller weekends throughout the year. Locations are often chosen for their scenic beauty, such as sun-drenched beaches with panoramic Pacific views, snow-capped Rockies, or dramatic coastal areas like “Steinbeck country” near Monterey, California. Specific venues mentioned include Ritz-Carlton Bacara, Rimrock Resort & Spa, and the Monterey Plaza Hotel, offering amenities like hiking trails, golf, spas, and proximity to cultural attractions like wineries and aquariums.”

The Colorado Water Users trips may or may not have been related to city business. However, Turner did not provide the necessary information to justify these trips.

Since Turner did not comply and provide the necessary information to justify these trips after repeated requests to do so, I believe he has been asked to reimburse the city. To my knowledge, as of the end of June, 2025, he has not done so. It is logical to assume that since he will be running for reelection to his Barrel district city council seat, he will reimburse. If he does not do so, it will be used by any candidate that opposes him. Reimbursement, should it occur, does not excuse the abuse of his city credit card for what can be viewed as personal enrichment activities.

In the final Part 5, comments and conclusions regarding Councilmember Turner’s use of his ProCard will be offered.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Jun 25

21

Reposting alert for Rovey Farm subdivisions

Posted by Joyce Clark on June 21, 2025
Posted in City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale Economic Development • Glendale elected officials • Glendale zoning issues • Yucca district  | Tagged With: , | No Comments yet, please leave one

I am reposting this blog in the hope that this time the link will work.

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

Yesterday as a city interested party, I received notice from D. R. Horton regarding their proposal, Westgate Parc, Case No. SR25-0322. They are proposing to change the zoning and to amend the General Plan for a 10.11 acre property located just south of the southeast corner of the 91st Avenue and Rose Lane intersection. This property is within the Rovey Farm subdivision and will impact those Rovey Farm homes to the north, east and south of its location.

The homes surrounding this parcel have 8,000 SF lots (the smallest lot size in Rovey Farm).

  • D.R. Horton is proposing changing the zoning from R1-8 (which requires 8,000 SF lots) to PAD Planned Area Development (PAD), which means practically anything is allowed.
  • D.R. Horton is also proposing changing the density from Medium Density Residential (MDR, 2.5 to 3.5 homes per acre) to Medium High Density Residential (MDR, 5 to 8 homes per acre).
  • They propose 38 homes on lot sizes of 30’ X 85’ (54.3%) and 32 homes on lot sizes of 50’ X 75” (45.7%). Ticky Tacky small homes in a gated community (gated to appease you).

D.R. Horton’s proposed plan is unacceptable. It will impact on the property values of all homes surrounding this proposed development.

It is simply an inappropriate project for this area.

As your retired Yucca district councilmember, I supported higher density residential WEST of 99th Avenue. If I were on council now, I would have met with their representative and told him I would not support this proposal. Hopefully, that would have been enough of a message for D.R. Horton to withdraw its plan.

I am attaching the 4 page informational letter from D.R. Horton as a pdf file here.

What can you do? Make your voice heard by:

  • Attending D.R. Horton’s neighborhood meeting on June 23rd, 6 PM at the Renaissance Hotel, Aurora Ballroom, 9495 W. Entertainment Blvd., Westgate.
  • Sending an email to Phil Martinez, Senior Planner, City of Glendale at pmartinez@glendaleaz.com and requesting that your email be copied to all members of the Planning Commission prior to the hearing for this proposal.
  • Contacting your Yucca district councilmember, Dianna Guzman at dguzman@glendaleaz.com
  • HOA boards – please send formal letters to Phil Martinez, Senior Planner, City of Glendale, 5850 W. Glendale Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85301

There are approximately 800 homes in Rovey Farm. Surely a majority of residents would join together to oppose this terrible project.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Jun 25

13

Alert for all residents and HOAs in Rovey Farms

Posted by Joyce Clark on June 13, 2025
Posted in City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale Economic Development • Glendale elected officials • Glendale zoning issues • Westgate • Yucca district  | Tagged With: , , , , , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

Yesterday as a city interested party, I received notice from D. R. Horton regarding their proposal, Westgate Parc, Case No. SR25-0322. They are proposing to change the zoning and to amend the General Plan for a 10.11 acre property located just south of the southeast corner of the 91st Avenue and Rose Lane intersection. This property is within the Rovey Farm subdivision and will impact those Rovey Farm homes to the north, east and south of its location.

The homes surrounding this parcel have 8,000 SF lots (the smallest lot size in Rovey Farm).

  • D.R. Horton is proposing changing the zoning from R1-8 (which requires 8,000 SF lots) to PAD Planned Area Development (PAD), which means practically anything is allowed.
  • D.R. Horton is also proposing changing the density from Medium Density Residential (MDR, 2.5 to 3.5 homes per acre) to Medium High Density Residential (MDR, 5 to 8 homes per acre).
  • They propose 38 homes on lot sizes of 30’ X 85’ (54.3%) and 32 homes on lot sizes of 50’ X 75” (45.7%). Ticky Tacky small homes in a gated community (gated to appease you).

D.R. Horton’s proposed plan is unacceptable. It will impact on the property values of all homes surrounding this proposed development.

It is simply an inappropriate project for this area.

As your retired Yucca district councilmember, I supported higher density residential WEST of 99th Avenue. If I were on council now, I would have met with their representative and told him I would not support this proposal. Hopefully, that would have been enough of a message for D.R. Horton to withdraw its plan.

I am attaching the 4 page informational letter from D.R. Horton as a pdf file here. Simply click on this link to view: DR Horton20250611_17533830

What can you do? Make your voice heard by:

  • Attending D.R. Horton’s neighborhood meeting on June 23rd, 6 PM at the Renaissance Hotel, Aurora Ballroom, 9495 W. Entertainment Blvd., Westgate.
  • Sending an email to Phil Martinez, Senior Planner, City of Glendale at pmartinez@glendaleaz.com and requesting that your email be copied to all members of the Planning Commission prior to the hearing for this proposal.
  • Contacting your Yucca district councilmember, Dianna Guzman at dguzman@glendaleaz.com
  • HOA boards – please send formal letters to Phil Martinez, Senior Planner, City of Glendale, 5850 W. Glendale Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85301

There are approximately 800 homes in Rovey Farm. Surely a majority of residents would join together to oppose this terrible project.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Jun 25

11

Councilmember Turner and use of ProCard, Part 3

Posted by Joyce Clark on June 11, 2025
Posted in Barrell District • City Council Actions • City issue and actions • City of Glendale • Glendale elected officials • Glendale finances  | Tagged With: , , , , | No Comments yet, please leave one

Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.

To date in Part 1, I explained the use of a city ProCard and how seriously it is taken. In Part 2, I showed what travel expenditures Councilmember Turner has publicly posted as well as all of the trips he has not posted publicly.

In this Part 3, the public information request I made includes any and all emails between city staff and Councilmember Turner:

  • February 15, 2022, Councilmember Turner is sent an email with an attachment that specifies his councilmember responsibilities with regard to travel as well as other items.
  • March 7, 2022, Councilmember Turner is sent an email with the city’s Travel and Reimbursement Policies.
  • February 1, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent a ProCard audit of his ProCard use.
  • February 2, 2024, Councilmember Turner’s ProCard limit is increased to $7500; there     are also requests for receipts covering April 7, 2023; September 12, 2023; October 24,  2023 and February 2, 2024.
  • March 18, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent a request for various receipts.
  • March 25, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent a request for various documentation.
  • April 17, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent the City Travel Policy.
  • April 24, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent a request for documentation of travel
  • April 24, 2024, Councilmember Turner is notified that his ProCard is suspended.
  • April 24, 2024, Councilmember Turner is notified that his ProCard limits are set to zero and his card is inactivated.
  • June 25, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent a request for receipts.
  • June 28, 2024, Councilmember Turner is sent a request for receipts.
  • December 20, 2024. Councilmember Turner is notified that his ProCard is deactivated.

Please note that I received no emails reflecting Councilmember Turner’s responses to repeated staff requests for receipts and documentation. He may have responded verbally and that would not be within the scope of my public information request. However, verbal responses are not sufficient according to city policy. All documentation and receipts are to be in writing.

There is no problem with elected officials attending the National League of Cities and Towns (NLC) meetings. It is a good way to learn by attending workshops and lectures. There is also the opportunity to network with other elected officials from throughout the country.

Typically, elected officials will attend the annual state and national NLC Conferences and in March will go to Washington, D. C. to meet with Congress members to lobby for projects that benefit their communities.

It was at one of these NLC conferences that Mayor Weiers learned about veterans’ housing. He brought the concept back to Glendale where it was then implemented.

Councilmember Turner seems to have no problem spending money – your taxpayer dollars – when traveling. For example, he, Councilmembers Malnar and Tolmachoff and the Mayor attended the National League of Cities Summit in Kansas City, MO from November 16-19, 2022. Mayor Weiers’ total for the trip was $1,968.23. Councilmember Malnar spent $2,269.60. Councilmember Tolmachoff spent $2,296.29. Councilmember Turner spent $3,285.79. Turner spent 67% more than Mayor Weiers; 45% more than Councilmember Malnar and 43% more than Councilmember Tolmachoff.

Here’s another example. Mayor Weiers and Councilmembers Malnar, Tolmachoff and Turner attended the National League of Cities Conference in Washington, D. C. from March 9 to March 13, 2024. Mayor Weiers’ total was $4,038.66; Councilmember Malnar’s total was $3,844.89; Councilmember Tolmachoff’s total was $2,973.60 (may have used airline miles to reduce the cost of her airfare); and Councilmember Turner’s total was $4,631.96. Turner spent 13.47% more than the mayor. He spent 20.47% more than Councilmember Malnar and 55.77% more than Councilmember Tolmachoff.

It was also on these two trips that Councilmember Turner received seat upgrades. On his Kansas City NLC trip an additional $96.59 was spent on seat upgrades and on his Washington, D. C. he spent $143.00 on seat upgrades. This is contrary to city policy which states the ProCard cannot be used to pay for seat upgrades.

He also tends to overtip (more than 20%) Uber drivers. Again, city policy caps tips at 20%.

As is documented under my public information request, Turner was asked repeatedly for receipts and documentation for various trips which apparently, he did not provide. This lead to the termination of his ProCard in December of 2024. 

Why did he not respond to repeated staff requests for further documentation and receipts for his travel expenditures?

He tends to spend more than any other Glendale official on these trips. It appears that he certainly doesn’t have you, the Glendale taxpayer, in mind. It may be that he forgets exactly whose money is being spent.

In Part 4 and last of this series, we’ll look at some problematical trips Councilmember Turner has taken and then draw some final conclusions about his travel expenditures.

© Joyce Clark, 2025   

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 

« Previous Page — Next Page »