Please note: Some of the information presented here is repetition of information from my previous blogs on the Cholla candidates and applies to all candidates. Some of you reading this blog for the first time may not have read the previous ones.

If you have relatives, friends or acquaintances that live in the Barrel district, please consider passing this series of blogs on to them as another tool to help them evaluate the Barrel candidates prior to casting their vote.

Early ballots are mailed at the end of July, 2014. Candidates (well, most of them) have their websites up, are raising campaign money (or not) and beginning to stake out their positions on Glendale issues.

We move on to the Barrel district council candidates in alphabetical order: John Benjamin, Reginald Martinez, Michael Patino, Randy Miller and Bart Turner. Three of these candidates will be reviewed together and Miller and Turner will be reviewed separately.

All of the information to be discussed will be based on the candidates’ websites and their June 30, 2014 Campaign Finance Reports. Some of the candidates I had met previously and am familiar with their positions on various issues. Others I have never met and so I arranged an interview with them.

We’ll take a look at each candidate’s Campaign Finance Report of June 30, 2014. Here is the link to Glendale City Clerk’s posting of each candidate finance report: . Go to that page and you can choose which candidate’s campaign finance report you wish to read.

Each report totals 19 pages. The first 2 pages are summary pages. Section A will show all contributions from individuals. Section B shows all political committee contributions. Section C shows loans either the candidate made to the campaign or any other loan received. Section D deals with all expenditures. Section E is for In-Kind contributions and Section F shows miscellaneous items.

This could be considered nit-picky but the finance report is 19 pages. Each candidate’s report should consist of a minimum of 19 pages (there may be multiple pages especially in Sections A and D). Some candidates did not submit the minimal 19 pages. It could be assumed that if they had no financial activity to report in certain areas they just did not bother to include those pages. Technically, that is not a complete report. All pages should be submitted and if there was no activity to report in certain categories, the candidate can leave the page blank, draw a line through the page or indicate “NA,” no activity. Even if a candidate has a treasurer who fills out the report the candidate is still ultimately responsible for the accuracy and veracity of his or her filing.

There is another kind of Campaign Finance Report a candidate can submit and that is a No Activity Statement. That means the candidate didn’t receive any contributions and did not spend any money. Some of the council candidates filed this kind of report.

The items to look for are: what individuals are contributing; are they Glendale residents, relatives, attorneys or other professionals; or Political Action Committees (PACs)? Did the candidate loan his or her campaign any money? How much? Are the expenditures typical of a campaign; signs, printing, bank charges, food for fund raising events or volunteers; web site design or hosting? Is the candidate using a paid political consultant? At what cost?

At this stage of the game candidates are often reluctant to reveal too much about their finances. They may ask that large contributions be made after June 1, 2014 to be reported in the Pre-Primary Report or after August 15, 2014 for the Post-Primary Report.

Bart Turner

Campaign Finance Report – He submitted 7 of 19 pages. He submitted Schedules A and D and omitted Schedules B, C, E and F. Mr. Turner referred to the Arizona Secretary of State’s campaign finance reporting instructions that state if there is nothing to report those schedules may be omitted. Self omission of those schedules can lead to report errors and a candidate may inadvertently neglect to report information. If disciplined enough, all pages should be filed to indicate that the candidate is aware of the reporting requirements and truly has had no activity in those areas by leaving the pages blank, striking through them or using “NA.” He has received 8 individual contributions to date. Two are from himself and a family member in the amount of $200. Three contributions are from Glendale individuals totaling $650 to date. Of note, one contribution in the amount of $300 is from Rodeane Widom, former Executive Director of the Glendale Library system. He has no treasurer. Please remember, Mr. Turner is ultimately bears the responsibility for the accuracy and veracity of his report.

Campaign contribution limits have become very generous as a result of recent court rulings. In the last election of 2012, the individual contribution limit was $400. Now it is $2,500. A political committee’s limit is now $2,500 and a Super PAC’s limit is $5,000. The trick for local candidates is to get large contributions. It’s not an easy task.

Mr. Turner’s expenditures are usual and ordinary and he spent $580.72 on web site hosting and design.

Campaign website – his website is:  . His contact information is: Bart Turner, 8217 N 57th Drive, Glendale, AZ 85302                                                                   Telephone : 623-487-3808    Email address:

His website provides you biographical information, campaign donation info and contact info. He does not offer any information on his positions on Glendale’s issues. I did not meet with Mr. Turner as I have known not only Bart but his Mother for quite some time.

Mr. Turner is a native Glendalian and has lived in the Barrel district for 10 years. He has a long and extensive history of participation in Glendale and Arizona community affairs. Most notably he is the current President of the Glendale Arts Council and was a former Chairperson of the Glendale Parks and Recreation Commission. He has been an ardent advocate for children, the poor and minorities.  He has his own property management business and believes that his work schedule is flexible enough to accommodate the demands of serving as a councilmember.

As a result of his service on boards and commissions he appears sympathetic to staff’s agenda. While his campaign literature will be used with Barrel voters there is no publically available information on his stance on a variety of Glendale issues. By publically available information is meant that his issue positions are available to anyone, in or out of his district. He believes that his knowledge of Glendale gives him the experience needed to understand and to solve Glendale issues.

Having reviewed of all 5 Barrel district candidates we’ll try to narrow the choices down to 2 people. In this district, as with the other council races, there are so many candidates none of them are expected to win outright in the primary and we can expect a run off in the general election in November.  Next up, Barrel district picks for city council.

© Joyce Clark, 2014


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.