Please note: I just received confirmation a few minutes ago that Jon Froke will not be resigning and will remain the city’s Planning Director. Thanks to Interim City Manager Dick Bowers for reviewing this situation and reversing the former City Manager Fischer’s decision.
Why is Planning Director Jon Froke resigning suddenly under mysterious circumstances? Here are the circumstances known to date. First, be advised this is not about Ms. Barbara Lentz. She is an unwitting participant and it could have happened to anyone. She is in no way to be considered as having done anything wrong.
On October 28, 2014 Ms. Lentz was appointed to the General Plan Steering Committee representing the Sahuaro district (Councilmember Gary Sherwood’s district) by the city council. Typically if an appointee is present that evening that person takes the Loyalty Oath at the council meeting. When an appointee is not present the Loyalty Oath is taken at the first meeting of the committee to which the person has been appointed. Apparently Ms. Lentz was not present that evening. On December 3, 2014 Ms. Lentz attended her first General Plan Steering Committee meeting and took the Loyalty Oath at that time. A regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on January 8, 2015. In the minutes of that meeting roll call identifies the following commissioners as present: Johnston, Hirsch, Lenox, Berryhill and Lentz. Ms. Lentz voted as a Planning Commissioner that evening. Without Lentz there would have been no quorum of the commission and the meeting would not have been held.
Now the mystery begins. How did Ms. Lentz sit as a Planning and Zoning Commissioner that evening? A review of council minutes for the two months preceding her sitting as a Planning Commissioner shows that city council did not appoint her to that position. How did she get there? City council minutes confirm her appointment as a General Plan Steering Committee member, not as a member of the Planning Commission.
There were three items on the Planning Commission’s agenda of January 8, 2015. One item, a Conditional Use Permit passed on a 3-2 vote with Ms. Lentz’ voting in the majority. The other two agenda items were passed unanimously by the 4 regularly seated Planning Commissioners.
Mr. Froke was not in attendance at the January 8, 2015 meeting. That is not unusual. If it were an agenda item of major significance or one that may be considered complex or contentious he would have been there. The items on that night’s agenda fit none of those criteria. In his stead Ms. Tabitha Perry of the Planning Department and Liaison to the Planning Commission was in attendance. It is also typical to have someone from the City Attorney’s office be in attendance to advise on any legal matters. Ms. Deborah Robberson, Chief Deputy City Attorney was in attendance.
Why didn’t Ms. Robberson and especially Ms. Perry, as the Planning Commission’s Liaison, raise an objection to Ms. Lentz’ seating that evening as a Planning Commissioner? Did they not know that Ms. Lentz had not been appointed a commissioner? If they did not know, why not? Ms. Perry as the Planning Commission’s Liaison is expected to be thoroughly conversant with all areas surrounding the Planning Commission. How could she not be aware that Ms. Lentz was not appointed by city council as a Planning Commissioner?
From here on the information is sketchy. It seems that former City Manager Fischer had an investigation into the whole matter which appears to have resulted in the resignation of Planning Director Jon Froke and the appointment of…you guessed it…Ms. Tabatha Perry as Acting. The very same Tabatha Perry who apparently didn’t have a clue as Liaison for one of her areas of responsibility. The first question that comes to mind is, did Councilmember Sherwood influence or urge former City Manager Fischer to ask for Mr. Froke’s resignation? Sherwood appears to have been quite unhappy with Froke’s performance on some of his pet issues. None of this makes any sense right now. If it was Fischer’s desire that a Director take the fall, shouldn’t Michael Bailey, the City Attorney, have received the same investigative treatment? After all, his designee, Ms. Robberson, was also present at this weird Planning Commission meeting and did nothing.
Jon Froke has been the consummate professional and a loyal employee of the city for many years. He listens…not just to the developers with a project but to the concerns of residents and does his best to balance both points of view. I will be the first to admit that I do not know “the rest of the story.” I would hope that Interim City Manager Dick Bowers would review the entire situation and that his findings would result in a return of Mr. Froke to his position of Director of Planning for the City of Glendale. It appears from the outside looking in, that an injustice has occurred and only Mr. Bowers can resolve it.
© Joyce Clark, 2015
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
I am totally shocked, I have nothing but the utmost respect for Mr Froke, I feel that as an owner and small developer in the City Of Glendale he has always treated myself and other Realtor Developer’s and private individuals with the care and professional handling of planning and zoning cases with the desire to not only appease everyones needs and wants but to fully understand the final outcome of the planning and development issue at hand.
It’s not easy to look into the future and see what is or isn’t better for the city but also the surrounding adverse affects that a particular issue might have now and in the future
So I will close only to state my opinion , and that I do hope he changes his mind and stay with the job I believe he really cares about
I just updated my blog. I just received confirmation that Jon Froke will remain as Planning Director. I am sure that pleases many people.
Joyce my sources tell me you do not have the whole story and Jon was a little short with the Glendale star as he tried to play the politically correct game agin. My understanding is that Jon was the one who had the information that could have prevented this comedy of errors and did nothing about it. While I agree with your premise that he should not have been threatened with his job in the now infamous Brenda Fisher style or feel forced to resign before the axe fell. He was a bit evasive about what was done and said to all involved on this issue.
Maybe this is one that you should ask for the emails on. Source tell me that Dick will bring him back if for no reason to show the remainder of the “women’s club” who’s in charge.
Amazing how it is always the Sherwood/Fischer names popping up [out in front or behind the scenes] on these issues that are an embarrassment to the City of Glendale’s reputation in the community.
Jon Froke was one of the most respected employees in the City. But, I can’t say I blame him for resigning. He had been through the Beasley regime & now, this regime! I am sure he was quite disillusioned to say the least. Who can blame him for leaving–this is Glendale after all! They can’t keep good people. Everybody I know who worked for the City & left are thankful! And, nobody, I know, who left, looks back.
Joyce,
There are several reasons I am disappointed in this story-
This could have been a story about Mr. Froke’s accolades in Glendale that he does deserve. His return to the city has pros and cons. Joyce, if I recall correctly, you served on the government service committee so you know the process for new appointments. Who is responsible for handling the appointments? Is it really possible for an individual to walk on a dais and no one ponder who the individual is? Planning Commission consist of a city attorney, liaison,an assistant liaison and a representative from the council’s office. I would like to know each individuals role as I vaguely recall from the GU courses. Did you have contact with Mr. Froke, Ms. Robberson, Ms. Perry or Ms. Lentz? A friend of Ms. Lentz implied that she did inform Mr. Froke that there was a mistake with her serving on the Planning Commission prior to the questionable public hearing meeting. Did Mr. Froke confirm her appointment? Was Mr. Froke forthcoming with information? Was his abrupt resignation because he was facing termination because of his lack of actions? Are we questioning his professionalism as Director of Planning or is this more of an unethical issue? I would like to know what is outlined in the personnel file of Mr. Froke, Ms. Robberson and Ms. Perry as I am sure it will help shed light on the unknown(s).
I for one did not agree with Mrs. Fischer and her management team but I think their actions were correct on how they were addressing Mr. Froke’s deficiencies.
Sacosta, While I do not agree with your assessment, as you can see I believe you have every right to voice your opinion. As I said in my blog there is much about this situation we will never know. You are correct. I did indeed serve on the council government services subcommittee (comprised of 3 councilmember and 1 council staff person). The council government services committee receives nominations for appointment from the councilmembers. Unless a specific reason is brought to the subcommittee’s attention the nominees are routinely appointed. From there the nominees go to a council executive session and again, routinely the nominees are approved. The council staff person will then notify the nominees of their council approved appointments and be invited to a council voting meeting to take the oath. The nominees are publicly approved in a vote by council and then invited to come forward to take the oath. After that, each relevant department liasion is notified of the new appointee. It is the responsibility of the liasion to inform the appointee of the next regularly scheduled meeting of the particular board or commission to which he or she was appointed. If the appointee did not take the oath at a council meeting, the liasion will make sure it occurs at the board or commission meeting. The city staff that assist the Planning Commission is a representative from the City Attorney’s Office and the liasion from the Planning Department. To my knowledge there is no assistant liasion or a representative from the council office that staffs the Planning Commission.
Again, the information I used was from people who knew details of the January 18, 2015 Planning Commission meeting. I did not contact any of the principals involved in the matter. No one will know what happened and who knew what from the results of the investigation into the matter as they are personnel records and not public records. You do not know. I made it clear that I did not know and speculated from that point forward. Mr. Froke is an honorable man with an excellent record of service to the city. The Interim City Manager, Dick Bowers, apparently has had an opportunity to review the situation and seems to have found Mr. Froke’s cause for resignation without merit. Mr. Bowers is a man of utmost integrity and honestly. If he retained Mr. Froke he did so on the merits of the situation.
I agree with what has been said but I am sure there is a lot more to this story that is behind the scenes that we may never know. Jon Froke is very respected by the developers, business people and the public. I have never heard anything derogatory about Jon. He is one of the most professional, conscientious staff the city has. I desperately encouraged him to not resign and therefore so glad to hear he is back.
Joyce,
I am delighted that Mr. Bowers allowed Mr.Froke to return as Director of Planning. As a developer, I have worked with Jon and Tabitha; both are deserving of accolades for the service they provide with only having two planners. My experiences with Planning Commission were handled with the most professionalism from staff to the commissioners. I could only wish the applicant whom lost in this mystery issue had my experience.
In the end, this was an unfortunate mistake. Mistakes will occur when staffing levels are severely low, morale is low, mistrust between leadership and staff and now what maybe a mistrust between a director, an assistant director and the attorney’s office that will surely create a mistrust within the Planning Commission.
Mr. Bowers will need to fix the city through cleaning out the manager’s office, hiring staff and fixing the moral issues within.
I agree with you that the staffing level in Glendale is ridiculously low for a city of that size with so many things going on
The much smaller westvalley cities like Buckeye and Goodyear has larger planning departments. But that’s what you get when you have a director so willing to please his boss that he give up all his staff and continue to promise the same high level of service and a boss that thinks the marketing department is so important that they should have more staff than the planning department
I agree with all the accolades being served up one Jon as a planner, however I think what the city need now is someone with exceptional leadership skills to lead the department from under this dark cloud. I hope that with his return he can make the department relevant and provide the type of support his staff needs to do their job. From some the comments on this blog withholding information is not the way to that Jon. If that is the case he must do better. At least one of my friends with some inside knowledge say this is one of his short comings along with his lack of support for his staff, he is the type of manager who is not always upfront with the information he has at his disposal. He is always trying to make sure he gets recognized as the one who got it done. This could be why those people from the development community will always think he is the greatest thing to happen in Glendale. But let take a look at history, Jon had very little to with westgate and the arena, he had nothing to do with Tanger, the stadium or any others development along the 101. I watched with shame how he handled the electronic billboards issue in our city we are still having to deal with this issue in the arrowhead area because of his inability to standup for what is right. For years Jon has been working on a downtown plan could I ask where are we on that plan?
Welcome back Jon. I hope you use this opportunity to give your staff and coworkers the respect they deserve and work cooperatively with them rather than continuing to using them to make yourself look and feel good.
It is astonishing how much information this blog provides. I was unaware the city was still dealing billboards. I also was disappointed in how Jon handled the billboard case. I recall the first meetings that lead to the application being denied. The applicant or the owner called Jon a liar at the PC public hearing. Then the council public meeting was dragged out with an enormous amount of comments from property owners in Peoria. it appears Jon has numerous of difficult problems before him. I can only hope he will do a better job managing billboards than before.
There is too many problems for one man to correctly mend apropos. Hopefully, Mr. Bowers will have the support he needs to do what is needed in Glendale.
Joyce please provide details on billboards in a future blog. It will be helpful for residents to know and understand the history and future actions on this topic. Also, is there any new news on the casino? Now may not be the time to trust planning or the attorney to provide the information.
why wasn’t the director at the Jan 8th mtg?
I have no idea other than that the Planning Director attends P&Z commission meetings when there is an issue that could be complex or contentious. In most cases he had the Planning Commission liasion attend in his stead.