Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.
I often find that I no longer have the time to write. I confess I miss not being able to write several times a week. My city council job, which I love, is now a full time but for this evening, I am caught up. I have already done my ‘homework’ for this Tuesday’s city council workshop and voting meeting. That, of course, doesn’t mean that there aren’t things on my ‘to do’ list. I will spend part of this week reading “A Report on EMS Field Experiments” and read the sign codes from Peoria and Surprise in preparation for my Council Business Committee meeting. There is always more to read, more ‘homework’ to do, more events to attend and endless meetings…with council, with staff and with constituents about an issue or developers with another new project to consider.
Right now council is deep in the belly of budget season. Council started its budget meetings in March and just this past week had 2 all day budget meetings. Staff prepared a proposed budget for council’s consideration and we review every element within it. The old adage that “money is power” still rings true in government today whether it’s local government or the federal government. He who controls the purse strings wields the power. Budget is a season of the tug and pulls between staff, continually seeking more funding for its projects or personnel, and that of council with its own set of priorities. It’s never a fierce issue when the economy is bad and there isn’t discretionary funding. When the economy is healthy, as it is now, polite but intense warfare ensues.
One of the priorities for me for the past two years has been the implementation of a dedicated council assistant for each councilmember. For several years the council office has been on a 3-2-1 model meaning that there are 3 council assistants, each of whom staff 2 councilmembers; 2 ‘rovers’, each of whom takes direction (often confusing and without identification of priority) from the 3 council assistants; and 1 secretary.
There is a litany of reasons why this model does not work. One of the results has been that long term projects and research on topics are shelved simply because of the need for a council assistant to meet the daily tasks of the two councilmembers being staffed. Often the council assistant’s work time for each councilmember is uneven as one councilmember’s needs may, and often does, take priority.
This budget year I have requested that the full time employee (FTE) position that council gave up voluntarily last year to partially cover the costs associated with implementing the School Resource Officer (SRO) program be restored. By adding that one FTE, converting the 2 ‘rover’ and 1 secretary position to council assistant positions will finally allow for one council assistant to serve one councilmember. Because of the State Open Meeting Law restrictions I have only been able to discuss this issue with 2 other councilmembers. If I were to talk to 3 councilmembers in a private setting it would constitute a majority of council. It is a violation to establish consensus of the majority without the benefit of a public meeting. The 2 councilmembers with which I have discussed the issue share my belief that we need dedicated council assistants. However, 4 councilmembers are needed to give staff policy direction. I am hopeful that when this issue is discussed at our next budget meeting on April 30th there is a 4th councilmember that will support this initiative.
It’s a delicate dance because by charter, council’s role is policy making and staff’s role is to administer policy and their role includes managing personnel. However, it is within council’s purview to direct senior management, as a matter of policy, to staff each councilmember with an assistant. It then becomes staff’s responsibility to carry out this policy. As salaried employees each council assistant is ultimately managed by the city manager in his role as CEO of all employees within the organization.
In an acknowledgment of zero based budgeting each year council receives a detailed report on two selected departments. This year it was the Budget and Finance Department and the Information and Technology Department. I find the detail very helpful and informative but I would appreciate it if they were not the last two departments to be discussed at the end of two very long days.
Other things…there are some members if the public that do not like our City Manager, Kevin Phelps. The reasons are many and varied…some reasons may be valid…from their respective perspectives. I do like and appreciate our City Manager. I have served with quite a few…Dr. Martin Vanacour, Ed Beasley, Dick Bowers, Interim Horatio Skeete and now Kevin Phelps. The only one with which I never served is Brenda Fischer and for that I am extremely grateful. The one who stands out above all is Marty Vanacour but Kevin Phelps runs a close second. No one is perfect…certainly not me…and certainly not any of Glendale’s City Managers. Kevin Phelps took a city on the verge of bankruptcy and implemented policies that have made Glendale financially healthy once again. He is a man driven to make Glendale prosper and to make it a vibrant job center for Glendale residents. Along the way he has had a few missteps but generally he has been good for Glendale.
His past experience in Washington State includes running a major convention center, experience as an auditor as well as experience as an appointed and elected official. He retains my vote of confidence and I hope he will stay on for several more years and continue to ‘make Glendale great again’.
The West Branch Library at Heroes Park at the northeast corner of 83rd Avenue and Bethany Home Road is nearly ready to open. Look for it to open to the public in mid-May. As soon as the date for the Grand Opening is finalized I will announce it on social media. It’s been 20 years since the branch library first appeared in Glendale’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). An entire generation of children in the Yucca district has grown up without the benefit of a nearby library. I have no doubt that this branch library will be extremely popular and statistics about its use will far surpass any staff estimates.
Library staff will start preparing for the opening by having library furniture and shelving delivered today. The digital sign at the park alongside 83rd Avenue funded from my city council budget (taxpayer funds) has been installed and is functional. The first major message that the public will see on the sign will be the announcement of the library’s grand opening date. It will be used to announce district and city-wide events. Look for a Yucca district meeting to be held at the library toward the end of May or beginning of June. The date of the Yucca district meeting will be advertised on our new digital sign.
The next Heroes Park element to be developed is the water feature. Funding is secured (once the budget is approved) for the design of the water feature. It is my intent to request funding for its construction in the following fiscal year. There is still much to be done at the park but by taking one bite of the apple at a time, I have no doubt it will be completed.
So much is happening in Glendale and most of it is positive. While the economy is good and we reconstitute our rainy day fund, there are opportunities to not only bring new amenities to Glendale’s residents but to improve the look and feel of Glendale (neglected for years because of a poor economy). Glendale is on the move! Look for more great things in its future and yours.
© Joyce Clark, 2019
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner
When are the library hours going to be restored at all libraries?
Sue,
I plan to bring the issue forward as a Council Item of Special Interest (CIOSI).
Joyce, At the Council Budget Workshop you questioned Mr. Brian Stoddard, Public Affairs, on the value of having Channel 11, that it costs too much, $800K, and that no one watches anyway. I personally value having the ability to see videotaped Council proceedings and hope they continue. Videos are a record and level of transparency of city govt. that I don’t want to lose. Hopefully other residents feel the same way, and want the City to keep funding Channel 11.
Thank you Joyce! Also, was the $1,000,000 ever returned to the Art Fund? That should of never, ever been tampered with during the budget fiasco.
Thanks Joyce for your work on Heroes Park. We desperately need the lake and soccer fields in by next summer. I could not believe all the people and cars on the south side of Bethany Home Rd by the canal because there is green grass. I still believe we could get donations from the sports teams and Jake Long. Let me know how i can help. The street across from the park must have had 40 cars parked. The need is there and it needs to be in the budget. We need everyone to let our city manager and council aware of the issue and lobby them to get it in the budget. Thank you for all your support and hard work.
Tom, I could to make progress on the park. This fiscal year funds will be allocated for design of the water feature. We are working hard to utilize SRP water (as it is less expensive than CAP water). Working with SRP is slow and laborious. I thought city was slow…SRP even worse. After design water feature will be constructed. Am pursuing a grant for ball and/or soccer field.
Joyce, I have enjoyed reading your blog for years and your views on city business. Regarding the April 23 budget meeting what is your opinion of the changes being proposed by the City Manager? That the City Auditor would no longer be an independent office but would report to the City Manager directly. It appears that the City Manager would be given control of the City Auditor and that the City Council would no longer have that control. Is this what would happen if this proposed change took place?
Jane, We will be discussing the city auditor and the proposed changes at our Tuesday, April 30th budget workshop. I would like to hear staff and all city council comments before I respond to your questions. I do intend to write a blog about the 3 or 4 major issues that will be decided by council consensus at that budget workshop. From memory I know the auditor is a topic as well as reauthorizing one FTE in the council office. I believe further discussion of the fire MOU will also be discussed. I believe there is one other item but it escapes my memory at this moment.
Joyce, There are two articles in the Arizona Republic about the Mayor’s trip to Norway and some of his expenses that an Audit pointed out as disallowed. Is this the same city auditor who will be replaced and become an internal city auditor under Mr. Phelps proposed plan?
Jane, I plan to answer all of your questions but please have patience. I am consumed with the city’s budget and it has not yet been even tentatively approved. As soon as the heavy lifting is done. I will respond to your questions and many more. I did find the time to do a blog on Mayor Weiers’ trip to Norway and I think it will be ready to post tomorrow.
Joyce, regarding the City Managers proposed new department, Dept. of Performance Objectives, has Mr. Phelps told Council whether this plan has been used successfully in other cities? Normally presentations by Staff would show comparisons with other cities. In the past we have seen that Glendale city government likes to follow the lead of other valley cities. This proposed department appears to be a considerable change in our city government. I believe that the City Manager wants a Council consensus on his plan at the April 30th Workshop so he can move forward.