Disclaimer: The comments in this blog are my personal opinion and may or may not reflect an adopted position of the city of Glendale and its city council.
I have published two blogs on “What’s great about Glendale” and there will be more to come over the next few months but I wanted to take a break from that series and share other events and issues happening in Glendale.
Perhaps the most important events yet to occur this year are the Glendale and national elections. The Primary Election is in August of 2020 and the General Election is in November of 2020. The people of the United States will choose who will be the President of the United States for the next four years.
Perhaps what may be of more importance to you is our local election selecting 3 councilmembers and the mayor of Glendale. Those elected will determine the direction of Glendale for the next four years. Those running for reelection are:
- Mayor Jerry Weiers. As of this date in January one person has taken out a nominating petition packet with the intent of running against him.
- Councilmember Ray Malnar. As of this date in January one person has taken out a nominating packet with the intention of running against him.
- Councilmember Ian Hugh. As of this date in January one person has taken out a nominating packet with the intention of running against him.
- Councilmember Joyce Clark. As of this date in January three people have take out a nominating packet with the intention of running against me.
These possible opponents must do the following to get on the ballot. Each must form a Political Action Committee (a PAC) and register it with the City Clerk. In March each must turn in their citizens’ nominating signatures to the City Clerk. Those signatures must be verified and then accepted by the City Clerk in order to have their names placed on the ballot. The signatures presented must be of a minimum amount and the number required varies by district and also must be verified as registered voters.
Then the fun begins. Each candidate must make their case to the electorate over the next 4 months – April to the Primary Election date in August. That takes cash for signs and mailers. It may sound like there is lots of time but there really isn’t.
This is where I need your help. If you think I’ve done a good job as your representative please make a contribution to my campaign. I can’t succeed without your help. There are two ways that you can contribute:
- Please go to my campaign website,www.joyceclark2020.com, click on the “Donate” page and follow the prompts to make an online donation.
- While you are reading this, make out a check payable to Joyce Clark 2020 and mail it to:
Joyce Clark 2020 8628 W. Cavalier Drive Glendale, AZ 85305
Thank you for your support. I deeply appreciate it.
Now, on to other things….recently I had the opportunity to meet one on one with Arick O’Hara, the newly elected President of the Glendale Fire Union. We had a thorough and frank discussion and for the first time in many years I believe that this President of the Glendale Fire Union is someone I can work with. Only time will tell but I am very hopeful.
The City Council will begin budget workshops in March for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2020-21. As I have said on previous occasions, in fighting between staff and city council on allocating funding only occurs when the economy is good. When there is no money there is nothing to fight over.
One of my goals is to secure the funding to complete construction of the remaining elements of Heroes Park. Another is to secure some funding for the Scalloped Street program and for upgrading bus stops. I’m sure you’ve driven on a street like 83rd Avenue between Glendale and Northern Avenues. The street is 2 lanes wide in both directions on some portions and not on other portions. That’s because city policy is to have the developer of a new project such as the newly constructed church on the northwest corner of 83rd and Northern put in the new lanes adjacent to their property. It becomes a safety issue as the second lane appears and disappears along the street. We are at the point where I do not expect much more development, if any, on 83rd. With the Scalloped Street Program the city constructs roadway where it is lacking and no further development is expected.
There are many bus stops that have only a bus stop sign planted in the dirt. These locations need a shade structure with seating, a concrete pad and a waste receptacle. If we are going to not only work on beautifying Glendale and to encouraging bus ridership, upgrading bus stops should be a priority.
Recently on NextDoor, a website application that connects neighbors and neighborhoods together, there was a great deal of comment about New Year’s celebratory fireworks. In my opinion they were excessive and long running. People in my neighborhood started shooting them off in the early evening and they persisted until several hours after midnight. For about 8 hours my neighborhood sounded like a war zone. In addition, I know darn well a lot of them were illegal, shot into the air. I kept waiting for embers to start some kind of fire in my yard. It has become ridiculous.
I’ve read and reread the Arizona Statutes on fireworks. The state legislature has pretty well prohibited cities from regulating them in any way but I think I have found a tiny loop hole. The state legislature mandates the times of year when fireworks are legal to use. OK. So far the legislature has not messed with the daily time period when fireworks are legal. I have asked our Intergovernmental Department to work with several legislators making for example, the hours from 11 PM to 1 AM, as the legal time period for using fireworks.
Last year I introduced the concept of having a municipal representative on the state liquor board. Many liquor licenses that are granted end up have a detrimental effect in a neighborhood. Having a municipal representative on the board will perhaps make it more sensitive to the concerns of neighborhoods. The legislation made it through all of the legislative hoops until it hit the Governor’s office where he vetoed it. State Representative Anthony Kern sponsored the bill last year and has announced that he will introduce it again this year. “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again” or “the second time is the charm?”
I don’t usually make this offer but if you have a topic about which you would like to know more or a topic that needs further discussion or explanation I urge you to post your suggestion as a comment to this blog. No promises but I’ll see what I can do to fulfill your request.
© Joyce Clark, 2020
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which is in accordance with Title 17 U.S. C., Section 107. The ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law and who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such material. For more information go to http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Thank you Joyce for all the information. Yes, we need to make sure their is money in the budget for Heroes Park. Remember I suggested that you and I visit the Cardinals diamondbacks and Coyotes to help us out with the fields and look into some advertising for them at each field. We could also ask the community to be involved and set up a Go Fund. It certainly is an eyesore and believe me the neighbors are not happy about it as I know you are aware of.
I appreciate your support and Mayor Weirs for pushing the council and staff to get the lake in and some ballfields.
Joyce, I agree about the fireworks. A neighbor behind us was firing all manner of rockets and exploding shells into the air above our house. We called the Glendale Police but they never responded. Police departments valley wide are simply not able to respond to the increased volume of calls for service generated on New Year’s Eve and July 4th.
If they do respond, don’t they need to identify the person who was actually lighting the fireworks? If so, that would be extremely difficult if not impossible.
Simply restricting the time limits won’t help if the police can’t enforce the law. Changing the law, if necessary, to make the homeowner responsible would be much easier to enforce.
Thank you for looking into this- hopefully something helpful will develop.
Here’s something that warrants further discussion that goes along with exiting news I have to share. I have accepted full time employment at the fabulous new Desert Diamond West Valley Resort and Casino located right in the heart of the Yucca District that you represent! This Ahwatukee resident is excited for the opportunity to make his living at this beautiful new property. Normally I’d expect the Yucca District representative and councilwoman to be excited for the developments taking place, but wait a minute…..As I recall you opposed this project on false ideological grounds.
You didn’t want people like me to have this opportunity to make a living at a place that was recently won the Westmarc Award for Economic Engine. You supported every costly measure to fight the casino, including squandering millions of taxpayer dollars on frivolous lawsuits against the project. All because you alleged that the casino:
*Violated the gaming compact (false)
*Would cost the city millions in maintenance (false)
*Went against the wishes of an alleged silent majority (probably false, but perhaps they shouldn’t have been silent if they opposed the project)
Even though all three branches of federal government: Courts (repeatedly found on behalf of the Tohono O’odham nation) Congress (Failed to enact the Trent Franks 19th Century Legislation) and the President (Almost a certain veto) made it clear that this casino complies with all applicable law, it wasn’t enough for you. The 1986 Gila Bend Lands Replacement Act did not exclude gaming as a purpose for the settlement land, no matter how many times you try to misrepresent the Act’s alleged intent.
And look what wound up happening: No compact violation, no triggering of the poison pill, and no expansion of gambling or opening opportunities to commercial gaming interests. And clearly the rest of the council has a strong working relationship with the Tohono O’odham Nation. None of worst fears about this casino have come to fruition. It’s time you jumped on board and support all economic activity in your district, not just the ones you agree with ideologically.
Zrosenthal, Congratulations on your new job? What is it? Croupier? Waiting tables? Cashier? Security? I hope you will move into my district, the Yucca district. There are 6 new residential subdivisions currently being built within a mile, mile and a half of the casino. Unfortunately for you, two of them are already sold out but there are another four under construction. I fought the casino as hard as I could. I lost the fight. As I said in one of my previous blogs that if the Tohono succeeded I would capitulate and be fair. If they ever come to us with a proposal or request I will treat them fairly and equitably. That was my pledge and I stand by it. Don’t you think it’s time for you to get over your angst about my opposition prior to the casino gaining the necessary licenses and permits? That doesn’t mean that I don’t worry about Westgate, for I do. The new casino restaurants will be subsidized by casino earnings and put the restaurants in Westgate in an unfair position. Also, I still contend that an individual has just so much disposable income. I would prefer that disposable income be spent in Glendale where it generates some sales tax revenue for the city. Be that as it may, I will work with the Tohono O’odham if called upon to do so.
Of the potential opposing 2020 candidates, so far only one has set up a political committee. He seems like a goofball. When a council candidate’s priorities include education, that says a lot about the candidate’s misunderstanding of the scope and duties of our city council. I think Joyce wrote about this some time ago.
As far as the election goes, by the numbers provided Joyce seems to be in the best position out of those up for replacement. Incumbents have the advantage, and she has 3 potential opponents. From her position, the more the merrier. The more candidates an incumbent faces, the more the vote against the incumbent splits. Maybe a good, strong candidate will surface to overwhelm the rest. One can hope.
Joyce seems to be relatively well-funded at this point in her campaign. The $5000 she received from White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf surely helps. Her allegiance to the new fire union boss is also beneficial. For those not in the know, firefighter unions play a major role in determining who gets elected locally.
Joyce, you asked for questions. I have many, but here are a few:
1) Fast growth vs. smart growth: The mayor and city manager have both stated they want Glendale to be the fastest growing city. Is it better over the long term to make a bit more money today or look more toward the future by only approving better quality infill projects?
2) Is your position on Glen Lakes and similar projects in districts other than yours based on spite or revenge? At the meeting in which the Glen Lakes sale was approved your response to Bart Turner’s final comments about this kind of thing potentially happening elsewhere was that this had happened to you. You railed against higher density housing in your April 18, 2017 blog located here: https://joyceclarkunfiltered.com/glendale-can-do-better/
At the sale meeting you said you have no problem with the density proposed for the Glen Lakes property, which excluding the park area along the outside will be with 173 homes 5.0 homes per acre (actually higher now that the developer is talking about a 10ish acre park area — no open space inside the development). If including the park area, the 173 homes would be 4.0 per acre. Surrounding average of adjacent development is about 3.6 per acre. Compare with the densities and lot sizes you so vehemently opposed in your 2017 blog article.
Is this the best Glendale can do? Is eliminating an amenity and open space to be replaced with hop from roof to roof tightly packed homes on 45′ wide lots with no yards your idea of what is best for that property and the city in general? Has your tune changed from 2017? Do you now advocate this type of development within your own district? Voters will want to know.
3) Glendale is nearing its goal of having a $50 million budget surplus. Coincidentally, the sale of Glen Lakes will meet that goal. What does the city plan to do with this surplus after those who have sold off our assets and padded their resumes with financial “success” stories leave Glendale to move on to other jobs? Will the money be invested at an interest rate adequate to even maintain its value over time? Will this be used as a contingency fund for wealthy sports teams who decide to pinch our city for even more lunch money? (only half tongue-in-cheek) Will it be used to get better interest rates on other debt?
4) Sales tax. Glendale has one of the highest sales tax rates in the valley. Remember, it was raised after you and your cohorts at the time made horrible sports welfare deals that placed our city on the brink of bankruptcy — deals we will be suffering for years to come. After the mass layoff of city employees and reductions in city services years ago, other budget shuffling, and the sales tax hike the books are looking better today. Yet, the increased sales tax rate remains. Do you support reducing it, or do I need to continue preferring to shop in adjacent cities?
J.D. McKim, I will answer your questions in short form for now but several are worthy of a blog and as time permits I will respond in future blogs. If you haven’t noticed, a major portion of the city’s new development is occuring in my district and that in addition to my regular duties has precluded me from writing as often as I would like.
1) Fast growth vs. smart growth: The mayor and city manager have both stated they want Glendale to be the fastest growing city. Is it better over the long term to make a bit more money today or look more toward the future by only approving better quality infill projects?
I believe in better quality infill and in fact, did a blog on infill raising the quality of a neighborhood.
2) Is your position on Glen Lakes and similar projects in districts other than yours based on spite or revenge? At the meeting in which the Glen Lakes sale was approved your response to Bart Turner’s final comments about this kind of thing potentially happening elsewhere was that this had happened to you. You railed against higher density housing in your April 18, 2017 blog located here: https://joyceclarkunfiltered.com/glendale-can-do-better/
JD, snideness (??sp) does not become you. My position on Glen Lakes is not due to spite or revenge. I do not consider Glen Lakes to be a dense residential project at R1-6. I wish Stonehaven had gobs of it. Instead, Stonehaven will have 3,000 and 3,500 and 4,000 sf lots…scads of them. The average density of Glen Lakes is 4.3 home per acre. The average density of Stonehaven is 10 homes per acre. Keep in mind I cite average density. There is always a mix of lot sizes, some large, some smaller to create the average.
3) Glendale is nearing its goal of having a $50 million budget surplus. Coincidentally, the sale of Glen Lakes will meet that goal. What does the city plan to do with this surplus after those who have sold off our assets and padded their resumes with financial “success” stories leave Glendale to move on to other jobs? Will the money be invested at an interest rate adequate to even maintain its value over time? Will this be used as a contingency fund for wealthy sports teams who decide to pinch our city for even more lunch money? (only half tongue-in-cheek) Will it be used to get better interest rates on other debt?
I cannot tell you what will become of the surplus. That will be a council decision to be made during our spring budget process. I would prefer to see it used, as you suggest, to get better interest rates on existent debt.
3) Glendale is nearing its goal of having a $50 million budget surplus. Coincidentally, the sale of Glen Lakes will meet that goal. What does the city plan to do with this surplus after those who have sold off our assets and padded their resumes with financial “success” stories leave Glendale to move on to other jobs? Will the money be invested at an interest rate adequate to even maintain its value over time? Will this be used as a contingency fund for wealthy sports teams who decide to pinch our city for even more lunch money? (only half tongue-in-cheek) Will it be used to get better interest rates on other debt?
How soon you forget! Mayor Scruggs and I were not bosom buddies and I often expressed disagreement with the majority council positions but she had 4 sycophants that followed her lead on everything. I guess you missed the workshop on adoption of the sales tax where I insisted it be a temporary tax. I still hold that position.